Patrik Kittel Interview

Comment

Comment by Gary Stuart on January 18, 2010 at 5:50pm

Recent video interview.
http://www.horsus.nl/nl/?p=videos&i=409&t1=1

Comment by k innes on December 27, 2009 at 12:06pm

despite stating the rollkur was used for a brief period of time, it does not account for the rider's need to use it - their is no excuse for inadequate schooling, riding and setting of an example in an arena of any kind

Comment by veronica coolie on November 14, 2009 at 4:25pm

slc --

The level of denial exhibited in your rebuttal is astounding...almost impressive.

Anyone who has their eyes (and heart) open knows that what we see in this video is unjust and wrong. What we see, what we can simply witness by just observing, clearly belies the blind rationalizations coming from you and others who are comfortable justifying this abuse.

The power and purity of honest human discernment cannot be undermined by such disillusioned and faulty reasoning. The absence of compassion in the face of such obvious mistreatment speaks volumes. When words and actions are so glaringly opposed -- and no subsequent effort is made to acknowledge or reconcile this fact -- we have evidence of insanity taking over. To continue to proclaim innocence when there is unmistakable proof of wrongdoing is just plain madness.

Comment by slc2 on November 14, 2009 at 7:40am

"We don't like rollkur and we will stop it"

How? By making death threats against Patrick Kittel, his family, and his horses?

Fact is, you can't stop it. The practice breaks no laws - and no one has any legal right to stop it, not even the FEI. They would be stretching their legal rights to attempt to do so. Their charter does not allow them to stop riders from hyperflexing the horse's neck.

Is that right? That's debatable. SHOULD there be a law, or a rule? That's debatable. But the fact is that right now there is no law or rule, and the FEI as well as the countries they conduct shows in, are all countries of law, not opinion.

"Horses tongue was blue". Actually, Epona has been accused of altering the color balance of the video to make the tongue appear discolored. Look at the sides and back of the tongue - healthy pink. The tongue was not injured during that period of time, which was in fact 22 seconds long. Horses very commonly put out the tongue.

In any case, whether the tongue was out or not needs to be discussed separtely from the trianing method - the two have nothing to do with each other, and the horse has been putting out his tongue for years.

Comment by veronica coolie on November 14, 2009 at 2:40am

"Evidently the horse got the tongue between the bits and Kittel corrected it...Horses often do this - the advice in all classical texts is to stop and put the tongue back into position. I've seen people do this from the saddle effectively before."

slc:

In all my years of being with horses, I have never witnessed a horse being ridden with a lifeless blue tongue dangling out of its mouth. Are you seriously claiming that you have seen this before? And what's more, you have seen a blue tongue being stuffed back into a horses mouth while the rider is still mounted, and then watch him continue on his merry way with no concern whatsoever that his horse's tongue was blue? How can you witness something so obviously wrong and still think it is okay? A blue tongue is simply not okay. A blue tongue cannot be justified.To continue to insist that this isn't a problem just adds to the insanity of this denial.

If your own tongue were to turn blue, slc, tell me -- would you not view that as rather serious. Not just sticking out, but BLUE. A blue tongue is a sign of trauma; this really can't be denied. Would you maybe want to rest a bit if your own tongue were blue? Perhaps take a break -- immediately, right? Or would you just shove your blue tongue back into your own mouth and continue on like it wasn't a problem.

At the very, very, very least...at the very bottom of basic human decency, a blue tongue would signify to a normal person that they should GET DOWN off of the horse for a little while and offer him some rest. Perhaps wipe the horse down a bit, cool him off. This would be showing the bare minimum of human stewardship and responsibility. How can that not be evident?

To continue to act as if nothing was wrong, to not take responsibility for what is blatantly obvious to anyone who has eyes, just makes it all more horrifying. A blue tongue is evidence that something is indeed very wrong. Period.

Comment by Mark Mottershead on October 27, 2009 at 3:10pm

I have set up a site in discussion with Nadja from Horse for Lifer to further the campaign, which you can find at www.DressageDisgrace.com.

Please visit and support by following the recommendations as the more people who do, the more Google will notice. Thanks!

Comment by slc2 on October 27, 2009 at 7:20am

I know, in fact, that they are posing as crusaders, and are NOT 'undercover investigative journalists' any more than anyone else on the internet is - they are people out there selling a website, just like everyone else. FACT - you are jumping to conclusion based on what you read on the internet. I will wait to hear the FEI report. People hate hyperflexion - I respect their right to do that. But to try and force everyone to see it exactly as they do, I don't respect that. I don't like this method and I don't practice it, and I don't support a trainer who does. But people who do this method, I don't see as evil horse killers. ANd this horse has put his tongue out for years, well before he came to Kittel. I see riding school horses, my neighbor's horses, reining, jumping, dressage, saddle seat, icelandic, western pleasure, reining, cutting, ranch and trail horses put out their tongues, and in some cases, yes the tongue gets caught between the bits of the bridle. The rider handled this appropriately, and continued riding.

I see it differently from you - I am allowed to do so. That doesn't make me a bad person, and it doesn't make you a bad person. I respect your opinion - so respect mine.

Comment by johanna macarthur on October 27, 2009 at 3:18am

Barbara perhaps you would care to comment?

Comment by johanna macarthur on October 27, 2009 at 3:18am

SLC do you know anything about EPONA? do you know why they are undercover investigative journalists?

Because they care - not becuase they will benefit tremendously - gosh! "Is there much money to be made in undercover reporting, in the horse world?".... der dont think so!

Why has the so called interview appeared here (without evidence) and why would Kittel place 'his side' of the arguement on a blog? when he's under FEI investigation and the legal implications of that?

FACT - He rode in hyperflexion for nearly 120 mins, the tongue of the horse was blue at the beginning - for whatever reason - and he should have allowed release after reinjuecting it into scanic's mouth - he didnt.

I strongly suggest before you tap off a comment you check the facts they are on the EPONA website and eventually the results of the FEI investigation will be covered too.

Comment by slc2 on October 26, 2009 at 6:37pm

PS - not a fan of hyperflexion, but not a fan of making unfair accusations, either.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page